June 20, 2013

It ain’t about the “bus fare” stupids, it’s the corruption

 

A rock concert in Berlin or London?? Can you name that country or even the city?

Protesters in Sao Paulo

Many would probably never guess this is Brazil. A major protest in her largest city Sao Paulo. What supposedly started as a demonstration against a minor hike in bus fare, which by Brazilian standards is fairly large, escalated into protests which spread around this country of about 175 million souls.

“Protestors – mainly students – are taking the streets of Sao Paulo. The problem: the government just raised the bus fare from R$3 to R$3,20. The protests are getting a really violent reception from the police. You can see a video of the police action. The problem isn’t the 20 cents. I think the real problem is that we are having so many issues of inflation, very high taxes, corruption – 2014 World Cup stadiums being built with public money, costing about $1 billion each pop – so future looks really bleak here. Everything seems to be boiling after this 20 cents.

No guns of any kind are allowed in Brazil, except for the gangs of course. This is why the MP (Military Police) felt confident when attempting to disperse the protesters with only pepper spray, batons and tear gas.

And rubber bullets.

And it wasn’t just the protesters the MP were intent on dispersing, it was the press as well. In a country run by an avowed Marxist, Dilma Rousseff, who in my opinion and in the opinion of others as well, is intent on elevating her world status at the expense of Brazil’s people, of course wants to keep as much news as possible about these protests from leaking outside the country. Notice the expression of this MP officer’s face as he pepper sprays a member of the press:

Police in  Brazil

 Below is a most telling video right from the horse’s mouth:

Notice a woman from the press being injured by an MP baton.

As Brazil prepared for a soccer game yesterday against Japan protesters even took to the streets in the capital, Brasilia, to protest the high cost of hosting the World Cup in 2014.

Tear gas bombs were thrown by the police and pepper spray was used to try to control the protesters as they moved near the venue. Local media said police later shot rubber bullets to disperse the crowd and at least two people were injured, including a 16-year-old student. Authorities said 15 people were arrested.

So how many readers have heard about these protests? The majority of the info I’ve gotten has unfortunately not been from NBC, CBS or ABC. But from twitter. CNN did at least allow a posting by what appears to be a brasileiro. The comments are most telling about the situation there: (note, misspellings are by the poster).

If CNN puclishes this article, it will be helping the democratic process in Brazil. We are trying to truly live in democracy, but our government does no accept our people’s will. Our media helps this corrupt government because it receives special favors conceded by those in power. If it weren’t for the internet, nobody would be able to understand what really is going on in our country.

As protests from other countries about poor living conditions, economic problems and government corruption spread from the Middle East, Europe and Turkey brasileiros in other countries are attempting to organize massive “support protests” around the world for this coming Tuesday in support of Brazil. 27 countries at this point.

So what is now a *headache* for President Rousseff may very well turn into a *migraine* on Tuesday. But not to worry, perhaps Obama will come to the rescue. After all, they are pals….

Obama kissing Rousseff large

Crossposted at Grumpy Opinions

Share

Will Rubio be leaving the “Gang of Eight”?

As the Senate vote for the amnesty bill looms this Tuesday, June 11 at 2:15 pm, some are speculating Sen. Marco Rubio may be trying to extricate himself from the “Gang of Eight.”

The “Gang of Eight” are a by-partisan group of U.S. Senators who unveiled a plan for immigration overhaul in January of this year. The Senators are Rubio himself (R-FL), Jeff Flake (R-AZ), John McCain (R-AZ), Lindsey Graham (R-SC), Dick Durbin (D-IL), Robert Menendez (D-NJ), Chuck Schumer (D-NY), and Michael Bennet (D-CO).

I had the pleasure of speaking with Mr. Roy Beck of NumbersUSA  an organization dedicated to fighting the amnesty bill and empowering the grass roots to help make that happen.

Mr. Beck reminds us of Rubio’s 180 reversal on amnesty after he was elected to the Florida U.S. Senate in 2010. During his campaign he was against amnesty and below are his words during his campaign:

“If you go to people and say: ‘Look, well you’ve been here for so long that even though you broke the law we’re going to let you stay.’ … It demoralizes the people that are going through the legal process. It’s a very clear signal that ‘Why go through the legal process if you can accomplish the same thing through the illegal process?’” [sic] “I never have and never will support any effort to grant blanket legalization amnesty to folks that have stayed in this country illegally.”

Many conservatives who worked to get Rubio elected to the Senate are feeling betrayed, at least on this issue. Joining the “Gang of Eight” may signal to us he is planning a run for the White House in 2016 and wants to ensure the Latino vote, but let’s remember Latinos wouldn’t be the only illegals to be granted amnesty:  it would be across the board to all illegals no matter what their nationality.

Mr. Beck stated that not only would the bill make American workers who are already out of work compete with those who would be granted amnesty but it would also add trillions of dollars to an already staggering U.S. debt. NumbersUSA has put out a short ad airing in 18 states which tells the dangers of this bill. Work permits are immediate which are estimated to be as many as 33 MILLION in the first 10 years.

The Heritage Foundation has done an excellent job of compiling these figures and they are even more mind boggling when used in pictures:

Lifetime costs of illegals

Below shows us what each person granted amnesty could be expected to pay in taxes compared to the cost of government programs they would receive:

Illegal immigrant households

Mr. Beck states Rubio is a master manipulator and has been blaming his consultants for misleading him and it is possible he wants to get out. This comes on the heels of an article from Daily Caller stating the union representing the National Citizenship and Immigration Services will be sending Rubio and the rest of his “gang” a letter saying if legalization comes before enforcing our U.S. border, which is the way the bill is written now, the policy will fail.

Heritage leaves us with one salient picture:

We've tried amnesty before

Please call your senators and urge them to vote “nay” on this disastrous bill even if they are on a “safe” list. Mr. Beck and his organization are to be commended for the marvelous job they have been doing fighting this bill.

Crossposted at Grumpy Opinions

Share

Numbers USA ad exposes dangers of immigration bill

Several weeks ago a large number of conservative groups penned a letter to the Senate “Gang of Eight” opposing their proposed way to “reform” immigration. One of their biggest concerns was it hurts American job seekers: those who are here legally, and gives preference to those who are here illegally.  Numbers USA, a group dedicated to finding ways to stabilize the U.S. population, launched TV and radio ads this week in 18 states to expose the dangers of the Obama-Rubio-Schumer Amnesty bill that rewards millions of illegal immigrants with work permits, imports millions more new foreign job seekers and asks Americans to trust the government will enforce immigration laws someday in the future. The Gang of Eight bill passed the Senate Judiciary Committee and comes up for a vote in June. This bill, S. 744, if placed into law would issue 33 million new, lifetime work permits to job seekers from around the world over the next ten years at a time when 20 million Americans still cannot find full-time jobs.

“The Gang of Eight bill abandons the 20 million of our fellow Americans who need a job; and it does so for the purpose of rewarding the wealthy special interests who wrote the bill and who will reap the profits of further glutting the labor market and driving down the wages of American workers, said Roy Beck, NumbersUSA president. “Under the flood of tens of millions more foreign workers over the next decades, more middle-class occupations will collapse and essential jobs that now pay near-poverty wages will have little chance of improving.”

Below is the 30 second ad:

Please show this ad to your family and friends and urge them to call their senators and ask for a “no” vote on this bill.

After all, their job could depend on it.

Crossposted at Unified Patriots and Grumpy Opinions

Share

Ohio beer wars shows crony capitalism

Beer

Doesn’t government have anything better to do with its time than try to regulate your beer? Apparently Ohio legislators have too much time on their hands.

Ohio Senate bill 48 was introduced Feb. 20 of this year and sent to the House on March 21. It received a single hearing by the House, which amended it, it was then approved by the House and Senate and sent to Ohio Governor John Kasich for signature. He signed the bill into law on April 23.

At first glance it appears to be fairly benign, setting up a two-tiered system for licensing which would allow smaller breweries to sell retail directly and bypass wholesale distributors. But digging deeper shows a completely different story. From Thurber’s Thoughts:

It does a number of others things, but one aspect generated some controversy: it prohibits large brewers from owning a distributor.

And that was a problem for many, but especially Anheuser-Busch InBev which has numerous options to purchase, or determine the purchaser, of distributorships throughout the state. So they objected to the terms of the bill – and the rapid process with which it was passed.

Now, the Ohio legislature is trying yet again to unnecessarily intervene in the free market and pick winners and losers in the marketplace.

Anheuser sent this letter to Ohio Speaker Batchelder :

“The buying and selling of distributorships is the natural movement and realignment of a vibrant, competitive marketplace. MillerCoors wants you to abandon a long-held principle that government has no business picking winners and losers in the private marketplace, and instead is asking you to put a heavy thumb on the scale in their favor to compensate for MillerCoors’ own business decisions.”

MillerCoors does not, as a part of its business strategy, purchase distributorships, yet it is asking the government to prohibit other competitors from doing so. From Anheuser’s letter comes more:

“MillerCoors has elected as a part of its business strategy not to purchase and own distributorships in Ohio despite being free to do so. Anheuser Busch has utilized a different strategy…now MillerCoors, presumably because its strategy isn’t working, asks you to change the rules.”

Specifically, MillerCoors wants the government to force Anheuser Busch to divest itself from distributors that it already owns. In a letter from Paul Lucas of MillerCoors to the Ohio Senate president Keith Faber:

“This further expansion represents a major threat to the health of MillerCoors in Ohio and could create a permanent, statutory competitive disadvantage for the company and its independent MillerCoors wholesale distributors.”

In reality, MillerCoors is asking for the Ohio legislature to side with them and intervene in the free marketplace; the government should not be picking sides or winners and losers. See Anheuser’s fears:

“MillerCoors’ adds insult to injury, knowing that if it gets you to side with its business, the two Anheuser Busch distributorships in question will be substantially devalued because the marketplace will know that Anheuser Busch is being forced by law to sell. This kind of intrusion into private business should not be the job of the government.”

So the bottom line is there are two separate issues here. The first one is the original bill, SB 48, which prohibits brewers from buying distributors. Anheuser Busch was against it, since they own distributorships. MillerCoors was for it, since they don’t own any and it’s not part of their business model.

The second issue is the one we’re dealing with now. Distributorships already owned by Anheuser Busch, including one in Canton (the one in question here) were grandfathered in under the bill, and Anheuser Busch is trying to buy more before the legislation takes effect.

MillerCoors is basically asking the government to force Anheuser Busch to sell the distributorships that they already own and prohibit them from buying more before the law takes effect, claiming an unfair competitive advantage.

The irony is that the only reason it’s an “unfair advantage” is because MillerCoors pushed for the law in the first place. They’re essentially using the Ohio legislature as their company’s legal arm, trying to change the rules.

Evidently legislators in Ohio are not in favor of a free market where beer companies are allowed to purchase distributorships if they so please.

Share

The Wrong Way to Reform Immigration

More than 100 conservative groups, Tea Party groups and leaders have signed the letter below coming out against the upcoming Gang of Eight’s immigration bill.

An open letter on the Senate immigration bill.

We write to express our serious concerns regarding the Gang of Eight’s immigration bill, S. 744. We oppose this bill and urge you to vote against it when it comes to the Senate floor. No matter how well intentioned, the Schumer-Rubio bill suffers from fundamental design flaws that make it unsalvageable. Many of us support various parts of the legislation, but the overall package is so unsatisfactory that the Senate would do better to start over from scratch.

We have a variety of concerns; some of us share only one, others share all. Among these concerns are that the bill:

  • Is bloated and unwieldy along the lines of Obamacare or Dodd-Frank;
  • Cedes excessive control over immigration law to an administration that has repeatedly proven itself to be untrustworthy, even duplicitous;
  • Legalizes millions of illegal immigrants before securing the borders, thus ensuring future illegal immigration;
  • Rewards law breakers and punishes law enforcement, undermining the rule of law;
  • Hurts American job-seekers, especially those with less education;
  • Threatens to bankrupt our already strained entitlement system;
  • Expands government by creating new bureaucracies, authorizing new spending, and calling for endless regulations;
  • Contains dangerous loopholes that threaten national security;
  • Is shot through with earmarks for politically connected interest groups;
  • Overwhelms our immigration bureaucracy, guaranteeing widespread fraud.

Reforming our immigration system is an important priority. But S.744 is such a defective measure that it would do more harm than good. We urge you to vote against it and against any cloture vote to bring up the bill. Only then can a constructive, measured debate take place on how to improve America’s immigration policy.

Signed (affiliations are included for identification purposes only):

 

List of Gang of 8 Coalition Opposition Letter Signers 

National Conservative Leaders

Barbara Anderson, Citizens for Limited Taxation

Gary Bauer, Campaign for Working Families 

Rev. C.L. Bryant, One Nation Back to God

Howie Carr, New England Talk Radio Host

Conn Carroll, Senior Editorial Writer, Washington Examiner

Ann Corcoran, Refugee Resettlement Watch

Monica Crowley, Ph.D., Nationally Syndicated Radio Host

Glynn Custred, Professor Emeritus CSU East Bay

Jim Eagan, Sumner United for Responsible Government (Tennessee)

Elaine Donnelly, Founder and President, Center for Military Readiness

John Eastman, former Dean Chapman University Law School

Ken Eldred, CEO, Living Stones Foundation

Erick Erickson, Editor of RedState

Maria Espinoza, Houston Eagle Forum, The Remembrance Project

T. Willard Fair, President & CEO, Urban League of Greater Miami, Inc.

John Fonte, Hudson Institute

David Frum, Frum Forum

Brigitte Gabriel, President and Founder, Act for America

Frank Gaffney, President Center for Security Policy

Victor Davis Hanson, Hoover Institution, Stanford University

Donna Hearne, Constitutional Coalition, St. Louis, Missouri

John Hinderaker, Powerline.com

David Horowitz, David Horowitz Freedom Center

Laura Ingraham, Nationally Syndicated Radio Host

Micky Kaus, Columnist, Daily Caller, author The End of Equality

Roger Kimball, Encounter Books and The New Criterion

Cliff Kincaid, President, America’s Survival

Mark Krikorian, Center for Immigration Studies

Stanley Kurtz, Senior Fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center

Kelly Monroe Kullberg, Christians for a Sustainable Economy

Stanley Kurtz, Senior Fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center

Lars Larson, Radio Host Compass Media Networks

Mark Levin, Author and Radio Host

David Limbaugh, Lawyer and Author

Herb London, President of the London Center for Policy Research

Dr. Gina Loudon, Nationally Syndicated Radio Talk Show host

Michelle Malkin, author of Invasion and syndicated columnist

Ed Martin, Chairman Missouri Republican Party

Jenny Beth Martin, Co-Founder and National Coordinator, Tea Party Patriots

Ken Masugi, Senior Fellow, The Claremont Institute

Andy McCarthy, executive director, Philadelphia Freedom Center

Eric Metaxas, Author and Speaker

Paul Mirengoff, Powerline.com

Frank L. Morris, Sr., Ph. D.

Mike Needham, CEO Heritage Action

Peter K. Núñez, Former U. S Attorney Southern District of California, Former Assistant Secretary for Enforcement Department of the Treasury

Rev. Rick Scarborough; President of Vision America Action

Smart Girl Politics Action

Carol Swain, Professor of Political Science and of Law, Vanderbilt University

Tea Party Nation

Virginia Thomas, Liberty Consulting

Brad Thor, #1 New York Times Bestselling Author

Richard Viguerie

Former Congressman Allen West

Tom West, Professor Hillsdale College

Tim Wildmon, President of the American Family Association and American Family Radio

John O’Sullivan, Editor-at-Large, National Review

Daniel Pipes, President, Middle East Forum

Judson Phillips, Founder Tea Party Nation

Andy Ramirez, Law Enforcement Advocate and Journalist

Sandy Rios, Vice-President Family PAC Federal and Morning Host for AFR Talk

Phyllis Schlafly, President and Founder Eagle Forum

Grassroots Activists throughout the Country 

Alabama Federation of Republican Women

American Grizzlies United (Wisconsin)

Angela Bean, Coordinator South Atlanta Tea Party Patriots (Georgia)

Blanchard Tea Party (Idaho)

Jack and Joan Billman, Greencastle Defenders of Liberty, Greencastle, Indiana

Martha Brewer, Lamar County Tea Party Patriots (Alabama)

Canton T.E.A. Party (Georgia)

Sam Clovis, President Serious Civics for America, Inc. (Iowa)

Common Sense Campaign of South Alabama

Carroll County Tea Party Association (Georgia)

Darin Danielski, Lake County Area Defenders of Liberty, Oconomowoc, Wisconsin

Dyersville Tea Party (Iowa)

Kay Edmonds, Precinct Delegate, Clinton, MI, l9.12 Forum Steering Committee Member, Lenawee GOP Executive Committee Member, Veteran (Post Korea)

Empower Indiana (Indiana)

Hamilton County Patriots (Indiana)

Mark Herr,  The Midsouth Tea Party (Tennessee)

Dustin Inmman Society, Georgia

Bill & Prudence Fields, Eagle Forum Virginia

Friends of Idaho

Georgia Conservatives in Action

Kay Godwin and Pat Tippett, Co-Chairs, Georgia Conservatives in Action

Becky Gerritson, President Wetumpka TEA Party, Wetumpka, Alabama

Donna Goeddaeus, Northwoods Patriots Tea Party, Conover, Wisconsin

Green Bay (Brown County) Wisconsin TEA Party

Greencastle Defenders of Liberty (Indiana)

Ron Hei, Tea Party Patriots of Covington County

Wally Hauck, Ph.D., President of Optimum Leadership, Member of Milford, CT Republican Town Committee

Marcia Hora, Iowa Grassroots Coalition

Illinois Tea Party

Danny B. Joyner, Commander, Alabama Patriots, Brewton, Alabama

Dave Kramer, Dyersville Tea Party (Iowa)

Las Vegas Valley Tea Party (Nevada)

Janna Loar, State Leader Ohio Counts

Michigan Eagle Forum

Montgomery Tea Party (Alabama)

Lisa Nancollas, Mifflin County Tea Party Patriots and Pennsylvania State Coordinator Tea Party Patriots

Sara Jo Odom, Eagle Forum Oklahoma

Patriots of Liberty TEA Party, Auburn, Alabama

Bobbie Patray, President Eagle Forum Tennessee

Carol Payne, Eagle Forum Lubbock, Texas

Pennsylvania Coalition for Responsible Government

John Putnam, Chairman, Jasper County Republican Central Committee (Missouri)

Merre Putnam, State Committewoman, 32nd Senatorial District

Steve Ramey and David Hancock, Gwinnett Tea Party (Atlanta)

Russell Ramland Park Cities/Preston Hollow Leadership Forum, Dallas, Texas

Jennifer Schubert-Akin, Activist Steamboat Springs, Colorado

Janet Smith, Local Coordinator, Greenfield Area Tea Party, Greenfield Indiana

Standpoint Tea Party Patriots (Idaho)

Rainy Day Patriots (Alabama)

Jeff Schwilk, San Diegans for Secure Borders Coalition

Kim Simac and Shirley Kufeldt, Northwood Patriots, Eagle River, Wisconsin

Todd Isaac “Ike” Skelton Lebanon Tea Party (Missouri)

Janet Smith, Greenfield Area Tea Party (Indiana)

Loretta and Ricky Short, Wetumpka TEA Party (Alabama)

Eunie Smith, President, Eagle Forum of Alabama

South West Pennsylvania Eagle Forum

Pam Stout, Idaho State Coordinator, Tea Party Patriots

Barbara Susco, Florida Eagle Forum

Taxed Enough Already Party, Barbour County, Alabama

Taxed Enough Already Party, Quitman County, Georgia

Tea Party North (Indiana)

Vanderburgh County Tea Party Patriots (Indiana)

Dawn Wildman SoCal Tax Revolt Coalition, Inc.

Don and Skeet Workman, Eagle Forum Lubbock, Texas

Sally Zelikovsky, Founder of Bay Area Patriots and Coordinator of San Francisco Tea Party

Dennis Zellaha, Tea Party Patriots and Iowa Grassroots Coalition (Iowa)

 

Share