May 17, 2012

Obama to cut 1/3 of our oil dependency, but not the way you think

In an economy that relies so heavily on oil, rising prices at the pump affect everybody -– workers, farmers, truck drivers, restaurant owners, students who are lucky enough to have a car. (Laughter.) Businesses see rising prices at the pump hurt their bottom line. Families feel the pinch when they fill up their tank. And for Americans that are already struggling to get by, a hike in gas prices really makes their lives that much harder. It hurts. —-Barack Obama, March 30, 2011. Georgetown University

Yes, Mr. Obama. We do rely heavily on oil. We have billions of barrels of it right in this country. If only you would allow us to get it out of the ground. And yes, you did announce today you want to cut our oil dependency by 1/3 yet your de facto drill moratorium is making this impossible. However you haven’t ruled out buying from Mexico, Canada or Brazil. How about putting Americans in the oil industry back to work first? Yet you’ve only issued a handful of deep-water drill permits since the BP blowout last April. IER has this analysis of Obama’s speech today, one salient comment from their website:

“The Obama anti-energy agenda has decreased expected production in the Gulf of Mexico by 360,000 barrels of oil per day. By withholding the necessary permits to produce energy in Alaska, the Trans Alaska Pipeline System is only filled at one third of its capacity. The Outer Continental Shelf holds at least 80 billion barrels of oil— four times as much as the ‘two percent’ the President says we have – but the Obama Administration either refuses to offer those resources for lease or refuses to grant permits to explore for and produce these resources.”

So let me be perfectly clear, a “handful” of permits ain’t gonna cut it. Let’s take a look at what it actually takes to get it out of the ground. You need a lease. You need a permit, an air permit and also a safety permit, and yep those are hard to come-by these days thanks to your work with BOEMRE  (Bureau of Ocean, Energy, Management,  Regulation and Enforcement). Hey Mr. Obama, I’ve written about BOEMRE so many times thanks to you, I even know by heart what the acronym stands for. From the Institute for Energy Research they provide this handy-dandy diagram:

howmanyleases

So it takes round-about 60 leases to start out. Just because you get a lease doesn’t guarantee an oil find. And just like chances are slim-to-none if your neighbor wins the lottery jackpot he probably ain’t gonna share his wealth with you, it’s slim-to-none chances the neighboring oil field who hits the gusher probably ain’t gonna share it with his neighbor either. So these oil and natural gas companies are taking huge risks at their own expense just for exploration.

And yet Mr. Obama. You go on to say this:

Other countries are now exporting technology we pioneered and they’re going after the jobs that come with it because they know that the countries that lead the 21st century clean energy economy will be the countries that lead the 21st century global economy.

We know this failed in Europe. Don’t you know Mr. Obama that “green jobs are the fruit of the poison tree”? It failed in Spain. It failed in Britain. T. Boone Pickens’ windmills failed in that huge ice storm in Texas last January. Are we supposed to fill our gas tanks using the wind of Alec Baldwin’s mouth? Doc Hastings (R-WA) Chair of the House Natural Resources Committee weighed in on Obama’s speech:

While the President and I share the same goal, we have very different ways of getting there. The President wants to decrease imports by telling Americans to use less and to pay more. Republicans want to decrease imports by increasing U.S. production – while simultaneously creating American jobs, raising revenue to help pay down the national debt, lowering energy costs and increasing our energy independence. I hope the President would be willing to work with Congress in achieving his goal to cut imports by unlocking our American energy resources [emphasis mine].

Yes Chairman Hastings. You say it very well, in a nutshell.

Crossposted at Unified Patriots

Related articles:

House Natural Resources Committee introduces three bills to increase off-shore energy production.

Obama betrays American people with intent to buy oil from Brazil.

The “Pay more for gasoline” president.

Obama’s misleading “spin” on the US energy situation.

The Trouble with Tripoli

As the world watches Colonel Moammar Gadhafi and the implications of a multi-national intervention in Libya, oil prices have skyrocketed in response. After weeks of unrest, Libyan oil production has dropped drastically – taking more than 1.6 million barrels of oil per day off the market and leaving working families wincing at the pump. With Libya unlikely to resume previous returns of production rates for an extended period of time, it underscores the importance of domestic energy production.

Libyan Output & Losses

  • World’s 17th largest oil producer
  • Normally pumps 1.6 million barrels per day; 85% is exported to Europe
  • Typical output is equivalent to 2% of global consumption
  • Unrest has cut output to about 400,000 barrels per day
  • 5% of Libyan oil is exported to the United States

Implications

  • Libyan output may continue to drop – or cease all together – if unrest continues
  • It could be years before production rates return to previous levels
  • Countries in Europe typically supplied by Libya will need new sources of oil
  • US will be competing more aggressively for oil with influx of European markets
  • Oil prices will rise as the commodity becomes scarcer in the market
  • US must begin serious movement in tapping domestic resources

National Security and Domestic Production

  • The Interior has only approved 5 deepwater drilling permits in the last year, 3 of which had received prior approval
  • President’s FY 2011 budget proposal included upwards of $36 billion in new oil and natural gas taxes
  • BOEMRE officials say they have received 43 deepwater drilling permit applications that are subject to new federal offshore drilling safety and environmental requirements put into place in the fall. BOEMRE has returned 22 of those applications back to the operator to request additional information about subsea containment of a spill.
  • 220,000 barrels of oil per day can be extracted from the Gulf of Mexico
  • The President pledged his support to the development of Brazilian oil reserves, putting Brazilian oil production ahead of our own, telling them, “We want to be one of your best customers.” Meanwhile, the Obama administration continues to lock away North American oil supplies and delay the Canadian oil sands pipeline, a multi-billion dollar U.S. investment which will give the U.S. access to the second largest reserves in the world
  • West Texas Intermediate and other crude oil spot prices have risen $15/barrel since unrest in the Middle East and North Africa began in mid-February
  • At least 13,000 jobs have been lost since last summer’s moratorium on offshore oil production, surpassing projected job losses in a 2010 study, according to the Louisiana State University professor Joseph Mason who authored the study.
  • LSU Prof. Joseph Mason also estimated the national job losses to have increased from 12,000 to 19,000; regional  wage losses to be $800 million, up from $500 million; national wage losses to be $1.1 billion, up from $700 million; lost tax revenues on the state and local level to be $155 million, up from $100 million; and lost tax revenues on the national level to be $350 million, up from $200 million.

In Their Own Words

“We are in Libya because of oil. It all goes back to the 5 million barrels of oil we import from OPEC on a daily basis. I think all Americans know why the president made this strike. As long as no American soldiers are on the ground … then I think it’s a good decision for the president.” -Rep. Ed Markey (D-MA) March 21, 2011, MSNBC

“[W]e want to partner with Brazil…on the issue of energy, which is why President Rousseff and I…agreed to launch a Strategic Energy Dialogue. By some estimates, the oil you recently discovered off the shores of Brazil could amount to twice the reserves we have in the United States. We want to work with you. We want to help with technology and support to develop these oil reserves safely, and when you’re ready to start selling, we want to be one of your best customers. At a time when we’ve been reminded how easily instability in other parts of the world can affect the price of oil, the United States could not be happier with the potential for a new, stable source of energy.” -Obama’s address last Saturday to the CEO Business Summit in Brasilia, Brazil

Three bills to increase offshore energy production introduced

Don Hastings (R-WA) Chair of the House Natural Resources Committee has just introduced 3 bills to increase US off-shore energy production. The purpose of course is to put people back to work, lower gasoline prices for the consumer, cut costs to businesses and consumers to allow more dollars to be put back into our economy and to make the US less reliant on foreign energy including OPEC. To demonstrate what has happened since the Obama administration came into play, below is how our off-shore energy production looked after the drilling moratorium was lifted under the GWB administration:

Offshore areas open when Obama took office

The green areas are all those areas open for drilling. Contrast the above with the below, what has happened since the Obama administration has come into play and effectively place a de facto moratorium on drilling because of slow-walking of permits and Secretary of Interior’s Ken Salazar’s refusal to obey a Louisiana judge’s order to end the drill moratorium in the Gulf.

Offshore drilling areas Obama has blocked

The red areas are the areas the Obama administration has blocked for off-shore drilling. Now let’s take a look at the list of deep-water rigs that have left the Gulf of Mexico since Obama’s de facto moratorium was put in place:

rigs which have left Gulf

In response the following three bills have been introduced:

  • The Putting the Gulf Back to Work Act would end the Obama Administration’s de facto moratorium in the Gulf of Mexico in a safe, responsible, transparent manner by setting firm time-lines for considering permits to drill, which provide certainty and allow employers and workers to get back on the job.
  • The Restarting American Offshore Leasing Now Act would require the Obama Administration to move forward promptly to conduct offshore lease sales in the Gulf of Mexico and offshore Virginia that the Obama Administration has delayed or canceled. Due to the Obama Administration’s actions, in 2011 there will be no offshore lease sales – the first time since 1958.
  • The Reversing President Obama’s Offshore Moratorium Act would lift the President’s ban on new offshore drilling by requiring the Administration to move forward in the 2012-2017 lease plan with energy production in areas containing the most oil and natural gas resources.

Should these bills be passed this is what our off-shore drilling could look like later this year:

reversal of blocked drilling map

Quite a difference, eh?

More detailed information can be found at the House Natural Resources Committee website.

Related story: Obama betrays American People with his intent to buy oil from Brazil

Crossposted at Unified Patriots

Battling bills in the Senate on EPA reform, Dems v. Repubs

For background please see my previous article, “Obama pouts & tries end-run around Congress to pass cap & trade.”

Dueling Senate bills and resolutions on how to rein in the over-reaching EPA could come as early as Tuesday. H/t to Jeff Dunetz at YidwithLid, not only has Obama lost support of The Washington Post for his “energy bill” but my own research has told me he’s lost the support of  the Wall Street Journal as well:

The Environmental Protection Agency debate lands in the Senate this week, amid the makings of a left-right coalition to mitigate the agency’s abuses. Few other votes this year could do more to help the private economy—but only if enough Democrats are willing to buck the White House.

This moment arrived unexpectedly, with Majority Leader Harry Reid opening a small business bill to amendments. Republican leader Mitch McConnell promptly introduced a rider to strip the EPA of the carbon regulation authority that the Obama Administration has given itself. Two weeks ago, Mr. Reid pulled the bill from the floor once it became clear Mr. McConnell might have the 13 Democrats he needs to clear 60.

Those “riders” are per S.493, the Small Business Innovation Research and Authorization Bill which would reduce the size of government. Additional riders provided by Patriot Action Network.

  • McConnell/Inhofe amendment #183 (prohibit EPA regulation of greenhouse gas emissions);
  • Landrieu 2nd-degree amendment #244 (enactment date change) to amendment #183;
  • Vitter amendment #178 (sell unused federal property);
  • Johanns amendment #161 (repeal 1099 reporting requirements);
  • Cornyn amendment #186 (bipartisan commission on oversight and eliminating wasteful government spending);
  • Paul amendment #199 (cut $200 billion in FY 2011 spending);
  • Sanders amendment #207 (point of order re: Social Security);
  • Hutchison amendment #197 (delay implementation of Obama’s health spending bill until pending lawsuits  resolved);
  • Coburn amendment #184 (list of programs administered by every federal department and agency); and
  • Pryor amendment #229 (Patriot Express Loan Program).

Back in January the Dems put out their own legislation to suspend the EPA for 2 years from implementing regulation of greenhouse gas emissions, the EPA Stationary Source Regulations Suspension Act. Manchin & Rockefeller weigh in maybe because…the EPA pulled the permit for a huge already-in-use coal mine in their state of West Virginia and 98% of the electricity in WVA comes from coal.  Guess they don’t want their constituents left in the dark so they make sure they put the “X” next to their names in the next election.  Also on the list are McCaskill, Johnson, Nelson and Conrad.

This stunning quote from “Bloody Mary” Landrieu (D-LA):

“The Fact Remains That Allowing The EPA To Make An End Run Around Congress And Twist The Clean Air Act For This Purpose Would Result In Ever-Changing Regulations And Uncertainty In The Private Investment Market That Would Damage Louisiana’s Already Fragile Economy And Fail To Address The Risks Of Climate Change.”

Even ultra-lib Sherrod Brown isn’t sure how OHIO will be affected, per the Hill:

Brown — who faces reelection in 2012 in the battleground Midwest state — wrote to President Obama Monday calling for a review of the “economic repercussions and potential unintended consequences” of regulations the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has begun to phase in this year.

The Journal closes it out by stating:

The McConnell amendment is one of the best proposals for growth and job creation to make it onto the Senate docket in years. If Mr. Obama is intent on defending the EPA’s regulatory assault, then the least Senate Democrats can do is force him to defend his choices himself.

Pay close attention this week folks. Even if it passes the Senate, be sure that Obama will veto it.

Crossposted at Unified Patriots

Brazilian oil-giant Petrobras receives approval for facility in Gulf of Mexico

*Update 3/27/11. I received the below clarification via email request from Peter Lovie, whose study is linked in the article.

The discovery at Cascade was by BHP as operator with Petrobras America and Devon Energy as partners. In 2006 BHP withdrew and Petrobras America became operator and was able to accelerate the plans for development of that block which Devon and Petrobras had been lobbying for in the prior 2 years. In 2009 Devon decided to exit the offshore altogether and Petrobras exercised their preemptive right to buy out Devon’s 50% interest in Cascade and is now 100% owner of Cascade. Chinook is 1/3 Total, 2/3 Petrobras.

Petrobras wanted to use a certain FPSO at that location which I felt was unduly expensive. In early 2006 Devon Energy convinced Petrobras as operator to open up for bids and in July the winning contractor was selected – BW Offshore who delivered the BW Pioneer that is now in GoM.

Original post begins below.

On March 17 the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement (BOEMRE) granted approval for the first-ever Floating, Production Storage and Offloading facility in the Gulf of Mexico, or FPSO. And the winner is…meg-oil giant Brazilian company Petrobras. Per BOEMRE:

The Cascade-Chinook oil and natural gas project, located in the Walker Ridge area of the Gulf, approximately 165 miles offshore Louisiana in 8,200 feet of water, will use an FPSO, the B.W. Pioneer, which is a floating facility that has the capability to process oil and natural gas, store the crude oil in tanks located in the facility’s hull, and offload the crude to shuttle tankers for transportation to shore. Natural gas processed by the facility will be transported to shore by pipeline. Petrobras’ FPSO will be equipped with a disconnectable turret-buoy. In the event of a hurricane or tropical storm, the facility is designed to disconnect from the turret-buoy and move off location until the storm has passed.

Below is an example of an FPSO facility, although not the same as the Petrobras unit.  These facilities are advantageous because no pipeline to shore is needed although according to BOEMRE pipelines will be used to transport the natural gas to shore for the Petrobras unit. This website has an excellent map of all the FPSOs in the world. Although I can’t confirm, my guess is the unit in the Gulf is the Petrobras unit which was most probably put on hold after the BP spill.

500px-FPSO_diagram

Why was Petrobras awarded this approval before American oil or natural gas companies? First coming to mind for many is that favorite whipping boy, George Soros who is a good pal of Obama’s and has a ton of stock in Petrobras.  I emailed Mr. Dan Simmons of the Institute for Energy Research and asked the question. His response was:

As I understand it, the Brazilians were the first to apply for a permit for an FPSO. I think they are ahead of the game on that specific technology.

And also, if one notices the Minerals Management Service and the US Coast Guard were all planning and clarifying responsibilities for FPSO’s in February of 2008, well before Obama was in the mix.

Let’s dig a little further into the Soros/Petrobras-US “loan”/Obama “connection.”

Yes, George Soros does have a fairly large amount of stock in Petrobras. In fact, he buys & sells, & buys and sells. Nothing that unusual for a man of his wealth. In August of 2009 he sold almost 22 million shares of common stock, which carries voting rights, and bought 5.8 million preferred which does not carry voting rights, but is paying a 10% dividend. The deep-water operating permit (DWOP) for Petrobras per the BOEMRE article was granted in August of 2009.

And an independent consultant, Peter Lovie, prepared a document The First FPSO in the Gulf of Mexico, the 14 year Journey where he outlines that FPSOs were thought about and in the minds of energy companies well before hurricanes Katrina and Rita, and then became a game-changer:

In 2005, operators for two different deepwater developments contemplated using some form of FPSO, both considering the use of an FPSO in an extended well test or early-production system. Both developments were located fairly close together in GOM deepwater in Walker Ridge, one operated by a supermajor (Chevron)and its partners, the other operated by Petrobras with partners Devon and Total. Each development involved two fields with different partners: the Chevron-operated Jack and St. Malo complex and the Cascade and Chinook complex operated by Petrobras [emphasis mine].

Just at the same time the blogs in August of 2009 and even the New York Times were announcing a “loan” by Mr. Obama in the amount of $2 billion to Petrobras and suspicions were aroused this could be “payback” for Soros. Also, the timing of BOEMRE’s announcement of Petrobras approval for the FPSO came on March 17 of this year, one day before Obama left for Brazil. Probably not the best of judgment in my opinion because it has raised more suspicions.

However, the “loan” was actually made by the Export-Import Bank of the United States and they debunk any connection to Obama. From their statement:

In April 2009, Ex-Im Bank approved a $2 billion preliminary commitment to secure the purchase of U.S. goods and services by Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. (Petrobras), Brazil’s national oil company. The amount of a final commitment may be increased above the $2 billion preliminary amount. Petrobras anticipates that it will invest $174 billion in development over the next five years. Potentially, Petrobras purchases financed by Ex-Im Bank will help create and maintain over 507,000 American jobs.

Not convinced about the “507K jobs” thing, but that’s what Chairman Hochberg is telling us. He even blasted the New York Times about their article on this “loan”  in an editorial on August 21, 2009.

Just so happens that Hochberg traveled with Obama to Brazil last week when Obama announced his intent to purchase Brazilian oil when folks up here are out of work because of a de facto drill moratorium in the Gulf of Mexico. According to the Brazilian on-line paper Veja (and yes, they are reliable) no part of the loan has even been doled out yet:

During his stay in Brazil for Obama, Hochberg, who was accompanied by U.S. Secretary of Commerce, Gary Locke, emphasized that the Eximbank will provide a loan of 2 billion dollars to import equipment for Petrobras America – line that had been assembled about two years. The first tranche of 300 million dollars, due out sometime next month.

So to sum it up:

  • The initial DWOP was issued for Petrobras in August of 2009, the same time blogs were announcing Soros, Petrobras & Obama were in bed with one another.
  • August of 2009 Soros trades in Petrobras common stock for preferred.
  • Ex-Im US per their website, actually approved the “loan” to Petrobras in April of 2009.
  • BOEMRE announces on March 17 of this year, one day before Obama goes to Brazil, Petrobras has received approval for its FPSO.
  • None of the money to Petrobras has actually been doled out as of yet.
  • The FPSO system in the Gulf was well in the works before Obama ever became president.

There is a certain amount of timing and coincidence which is suspect however after doing more in depth research I have come to the conclusion at least as far as one can reasonably tell at this time, it is just that: timing and coincidence.

Although many would have wished to find a nefarious connection here as a good investigator I need to be “fair and balanced” and if there is one it is extremely well hidden. I will point out that Soros through his Soros Management Fund does own a ton of oil, natural gas and mining stocks not only in US companies but foreign companies as well. He’s very diversified.

However I will say what infuriates me is a perceived betrayal by Obama of the American people with his intent to purchase Brazilian oil.

Related articles: Obama betrays America people with intent to buy oil from Brazil.

Crossposted at Unified Patiots