February 22, 2012

Americans for Prosperity’s bold plan to save Social Security

AFP Foundation headerFrom Americans for Prosperity via email:

Last week the President released his latest budget, proposing policies that would result in a $1.33 trillion deficit this year and continued budget deficits for as far into the future as government bureaucrats project.  As budget experts like the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office have explained, the main cause of the looming fiscal problems going forward is unsustainable spending in entitlement programs like Social Security.  Yet the President’s FY 2013 budget does not propose major reforms to this broken program.

Social Security has nearly $18 trillion in unfunded liabilities, and with continued waves of Baby Boom retirees and sluggish growth in the number of workers to support them, the problem is only likely to get worse.  Opponents to reform often argue that the program can be fixed with minor tweaks around the edges, but those changes tend to make what is already a bad deal even worse for workers.

Unless the program sees major structural reforms, massive benefit cuts, tax increases, or more government borrowing will be needed.  This would be a huge disappointment to retirees, a drag on the American economy, or an even bigger debt burden onto the shoulders of our children and grandchildren.

Today, Americans for Prosperity Foundation is launching an effort to educate the American people about the benefits of optional personal savings accounts for Social Security.  It’s a policy that relies on freedom and choice instead of forcing Americans to stomach benefit cuts and tax increases.

And it’s a policy with several success stories where it has been tried.  For example, more than 94 percent of Chilean workers have opted in to their country’s personal account system, taking advantage of the retirement benefits that are 50 to 100 percent more generous than what their old system offered.

Click here to read AFPF’s new paper and check out all the materials on our new homepage for Social Security reform.

From page 5:

Workers could be empowered with a choice: they could stay with the tax-and-benefit system of Social Security as it is currently structured, or they could take some or all of the payroll tax contributions that they and their employer currently pay and instead save and invest them through a personal savings account. In the latter instance, whatever portion of their payroll taxes that they chooseto put aside into their personal savings account would come back to them in retirement and substitute for the corresponding portion of their Social Security benefits. Plus they would also receive the accumulated interest earnings from their account’s investments. Such accounts don’t just reduce the growth of government spending; they also shift vast amounts from a public sector tax and spend plan to private sector savings and investment.

Please see the image below for a simple explanation of the plan:

AFP SS plan

AFP’s Phil Kerpen had this to say:

“The current Social Security program is broken. There is no actual savings, no investment, and very soon it will not meet the needs of Americans entering retirement. Our plan offers personal savings accounts that put freedom and control back in the hands of the individual, safe from government bureaucrats who would see that money squandered.

“If adopted, this plan would solve the looming insolvency of Social Security, while resulting in the largest reduction in government spending and the largest tax cut in world history,” continued Kerpen.

House Natural Resources Committee chart on gasoline prices

Obama Admin’s Skyrocketing Gasoline Prices Threaten American Jobs, Economic Recovery

Republicans Have Bipartisan Plan to Lower Gas Prices, Create Jobs & Grow the Economy by Producing More American Energy

gasoline prices

Higher gasoline prices could stall recovery, Obama’s re-election, Boston Herald, 2/21/12

“By summer, some analysts said, you could be paying $4 for a gallon of gas, almost as high as the record set in the summer of 2008. A price that high could cripple the still-fragile recovery…The average price for a gallon of regular gas in the Midwest was $3.41 last week, up 32 cents from a year ago and $1.59 more than the day Obama became president…In Los Angeles, the price of regular unleaded already is $4.93 a gallon and premium $5.09 at some gas stations, and the escalating fuel costs are expected to ripple throughout the economy, affecting everything from groceries to air fares.”

Obama’s gas-price spike, Washington Times Editorial, 2/20/12

“Here we go again. Gasoline prices are rising rapidly and already have shattered the $4-a-gallon mark in California. Industry analysts say the all-time national average record of $4.11 could be shattered this summer…This latest gas-price jolt is predictable. President Obama has done much to impede the supply of petroleum products to consumers. Most particularly, he exploited the 2010 BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico as an excuse to clamp down on oil drilling in the Gulf and also along the Atlantic and Pacific coasts.”

Surging gas prices threaten to derail economic recovery, LA Times, 2/20/12

“Just as the recovery is finally looking real, surging fuel prices are once again looming as a major threat to the financial health of U.S. consumers and the broader economy…Nationally, drivers started this week paying on average $3.565 for a gallon of regular gas, up more than 5% in the last month…many consumers remain on edge, burdened by heavy debts and very cautious about spending. With high unemployment…analysts say the U.S. recovery remains highly vulnerable to external shocks, perhaps none more so than a surge in gas prices.”

Gas price spike pumping up fears, Chicago Tribune, 2/20/12

“Fears of $5 per gallon gasoline are in the back of some motorists’ minds, jeopardizing the nascent economic recovery…Whether they break a record or not, rising gas prices could stunt the nation’s sluggish economic recovery. Economists say that higher oil prices may have crimped retail sales…The new economic worries are eerily reminiscent of what happened about this time a year ago when political turmoil flared in Egypt and elsewhere in the oil-rich region, sending crude prices sharply higher for months.”

Oil jumps to 9-month high after Iran cuts supply, AP, 2/21/12

“Oil prices jumped to a nine-month high above $105 a barrel on Monday after Iran said it halted crude exports to Britain and France in an escalation of a dispute over the Middle Eastern country’s nuclear program…Iran’s Oil Minister Rostam Qassemi had warned earlier this month that Tehran could cut off oil exports to “hostile” European nations. The 27-nation EU accounts for about 18 percent of Iran’s oil exports.”

As part of the American Energy Initiative, House Republicans last week passed H.R. 3408, a bipartisan plan that will remove government barriers to American energy production, create over 1.2 million jobs, help lower gasoline prices and strengthen our national and economic security. The bill would expand offshore energy production, open less than three percent of ANWR for oil and natural gas production, encourage the development of 1.5 trillion barrels of oil shale in the Rocky Mountain West, and require the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to approve the Keystone XL pipeline within 30 days.

Crossposted at Unified Patriots

Tax Dollar Tracker from House Natural Resources

From Rep. Doc Hastings (R-WA) of the House Natural Resources Committee:

Budget Watch: President’s Budget Increases Spending for Government Land Acquisition

President Obama’s FY2013 budget proposal released Monday includes $450 million to buy more federal land through the Land and Water Conservation Fund. Despite the Federal government’s ballooning $15 trillion debt, the President is proposing a $160 million spending increase (58 percent) for government land acquisition compared to funding levels when he first took office.

The Federal government already owns nearly 30 percent of our nation’s land and has maintenance backlog that registers in the billions.

“I must again question the need to increase funding for the federal government to purchase more federal land,” said Natural Resources Committee Chairman Doc Hastings at today’s Full Committee hearing on the President’s budget proposal. “While the request for land acquisition was cut in half from last year, it still represents a $160 million spending increase compared to when President Obama took office. The Interior Department continues to have a maintenance backlog on federal lands that measures into the billions. The bottom line is that we should not be increasing spending for land acquisition when the government cannot maintain the land it already owns.”

Buying more land

Interior

House Natural Resources Committee reacts to Obama’s budget

BUDGET WATCH: $45 Billion Tax Increase On American Energy Production Will Hit Families, Small Businesses and Rural Communities Hardest

Since his State of the Union Address, President Obama has repeatedly talked about expanding “all-of-the-above” energy production. However, a closer look at his Fiscal Year 2013 budget proposal reveals more of the same job-destroying tax increases on American energy that will stifle production and cost jobs. The President simply doesn’t understand that raising taxes on energy production will ultimately end up costing American families and small businesses thousands of dollars at a time when they can least afford cost of living increases.

For example, every penny the price of gasoline increases, it costs consumers an accumulated $4 million per day. As gasoline prices continue to rise, the last thing consumers need is more expensive energy due to President Obama’s billions of dollars in tax increases.

Specific energy tax and fee proposals in the President’s budget:

  • Tax on production of hardrock minerals ($1.8 billion)
  • Non-producing lease fee ($738 million)
  • Offshore inspection fees ($30 million)
  • Onshore inspection fees ($480 million)
  • Repeal Domestic Manufacturing Tax Deduction for oil and natural gas ($11.6 billion)
  • Repeal expensing for intangible drilling costs ($13.9 billion)
  • Repeal percentage depletion for oil and natural gas wells ($11.4 billion)
  • Increase geological and geophysical amortization period for independent producers to seven years ($1.4  billion)
  • Repeal percentage depletion for hard mineral fossil fuels ($1.7 billion)
  • Tax increase for Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund ($717 million)
  • Repeal expensing of exploration and development costs ($440 million)
  • Repeal domestic manufacturing deduction for hard mineral fossil fuels ($271 million)
  • Tax increase on capital gains coal royalties ($422 million)
  • Repeal exemption to passive loss limitation for working interests in oil and natural gas properties ($82 million)
  • Repeal deduction for tertiary injectants ($100 million)

McMorris Rodgers reacts to Obama’s budget request

Received via email from Cathy McMorris Rodgers:

“This is a Roadmap to Greece;”
Budget Would Add $11 Trillion to National Debt

Washington, D.C. – Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-WA), Vice Chair of the House Republican Conference, released the following statement today after President Obama unveiled his budget request for Fiscal Year 2013, which would raise taxes, increase government spending, and add $11 trillion to the national debt over the next decade:

“The President’s budget taxes too much, spends too much, and borrows too much. As we’ve seen over the last three years, that is a recipe for economic stagnation. And if we continue down this path, the economic consequences will be devastating. As we’ve learned from Greece and the European Union, no country can escape the consequences of Big Government policies forever. That’s why the President’s budget is a ‘Roadmap to Greece.’ The American people deserve better. And our children, in particular – who will inherit this debt – deserve better.

Under President Obama’s budget, the federal government will spend $3.8 trillion in FY 2013, while running a $1.3 trillion deficit. Over the next 10 years, his budget would raise taxes by $1.9 trillion, while increasing the total national debt from $15 trillion to $26 trillion. The President’s budget also threatens seniors because it does not make any fundamental changes to America’s entitlement programs. Those programs are growing in cost, threatening their viability.

“To grow our economy, keep the American Dream alive, and protect our seniors, I support the Ryan Plan,” said Rep. McMorris Rodgers. “This bold, forward-looking proposal would reduce taxes, cut government spending by $6 trillion over the next decade, and put us on a path to balance the budget once and for all.”

According to Standard & Poor’s, if the President had signed the Ryan budget last year, the federal government would have avoided its embarrassing credit downgrade.

Rep. McMorris Rodgers is also a strong supporter of the Balanced Budget Amendment.