February 22, 2012

Obama launches new H/C propaganda site today

The White House is “unveiling” it’s new website called Take Healthcare into Your Own Hands. Here is the e-mail I received from Nancy-Ann DeParle, Director, White House Office of Health Reform. And this letter is meant for all of us unlike the Medicare propaganda brochure the Seniors received I discussed earlier here. But this one is still a piece of propaganda misinformation.

E-Mail From Nancy-Ann DeParle, Whithouse

And of course, I took a look at the website. I first went to the “find insurance in your state” pretending I had none at the moment, and a list popped up which did contain Medical Mutual, the company I am insured with now. As you can see by the screen shot below, no info. No link provided for any of the plans, and price estimates not available until 2010.  Useless. Here is the link to the pic below, I know it’s difficult to read:

Medical Mutual from Whitehouse - Copy

Now on to the Seniors page.

Medicare page from Whitehouse

Key points, it states:

  • The life of the Medicare Trust fund will be extended to at least 2029, a 12-year extension as a result of reducing waste, fraud and abuse, and slowing cost growth in Medicare. This will provide you with future cost savings on your premiums and coinsurance
  • The coordination of care between doctors and the overall quality of care will improve so that you will be less likely to experience preventable and harmful re-admissions to the hospital for the same condition.
  • Starting in 2014, the Affordable Care Act offers additional protections for Medicare Advantage Plan members by taking strong steps that limit the amount these plans spend on administrative costs, insurance company profits, and things other than health care.

Ok, first one we know both Medicare & Medicaid are in jeopardy, especially with the $500 billion in cuts to these programs. I live with a physician. He is thinking about dropping Medicare patients because the re-imbursement is too low. And he announced to me last night he may even consider dropping his hospital privileges and just seeing patients in the office because his malpractice premium is too high. Couple that with the number of people out of work in my state, Ohio, who do not have health insurance because of job loss, showing up at the ER and can’t pay either the doctor or the hospital it’s a mess already. Several hospitals’ financials in my area show them to be in disastrous shape because of all the insured.

You guys can peruse the rest of the site to your heart’s content. Will make for some good entertainment.

More Pain from Obamacare: New Revelations

The news goes from bad, to worse to worse my friends. I’m sure the “pain” of this monstrosity will continue to grow until we’ll all need opiates to try and assuage it. save_health_care.jpg1But even opiates lose their pain-killing effect after a time and we’ll have to figure out something else.

Yesterday the CBO released another updated report on the financial negative aspects of Zero-care, this time on discretionary spending. The letter is addressed to Rep. Jerry Lewis (R-CA), ranking member of the Committee on Appropriations. Here is the basis of the letter:

In particular, it [the letter] provides an update of the earlier tally of specified authorization amounts, as well as a list of programs or activities for which no specific funding levels are identified in the legislation but for which the act authorizes the appropriation of “such sums as may be necessary.

What will be necessary:

  • Explicit authorizations for a variety of grant and other program spending for which specified funding levels for one or more years are provided in the act.
  • Explicit authorizations for a variety of grant and other program spending for whichno specific funding levels are identified in the legislation.

The above two items are expected to exceed $115 billion over the 2010-2019 period. But that isn’t all. Next comes the costs expected to be incurred by the implementation of these programs:

  • Costs to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) of implementing the eligibilitydetermination, documentation, and verification processes for premium and costsharing credits. CBO expects that those costs will probably total between $5 billion and $10 billion over 10 years. [emphasis mine]
  • Costs to HHS, especially the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and the Office of Personnel Management for implementing the changes in Medicare, Medicaid, and the Children’s Health Insurance Program, as well as certain reforms to the private insurance market. CBO expects that those costs will probably total atleast $5 billion to $10 billion over 10 years. [emphasis mine]

Yep, Obama. This law is really “deficit neutral” isn’t it?

According to Rasmussen as/of 5/10/10 63% of Americans expect this fiasco will cause an increase in the federal deficit, up 3% from when the law was passed, and 55% rate the present US healthcare system as good or excellent, up from 44% in February. Other bad news:

  • As mentioned in a previous post, the CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) predicts healthcare costs will rise, not fall as Mr. Obama claimed.
  • Healthcare costs will increase to 21% of GDP by 2019.
  • Medical-device companies will cut costs and jobs and future innovation will be compromised.
  • 50% of seniors may lose their Medicare Advantage plans.
  • Companies are reeling from ObamaCare’s job killing Taxes.

For those of you wishing to see how all this doom and gloom will unfold, here is the timeline of the implementation.

After all is said and done, and tons of docs quit practicing in disgust, will we be able to find a “doctor in the house” other than the one below?

Surgeon-in-Chief

Surgeon-in-Chief

Crossposted

TOTUS #FAIL. What happens when you have no Cliff Notes

Gotta start this one off with a video. Is sickening. Really, sickening. Either Gibbs the Fibbs had the day off, or he failed to tell Obama he needed crib notes as a back-up:

Just like Biden, one never knows what to expect from Zero when there’s a TOTUS fail. Yep. For himself, he doesn’t begrudge the $5.5 M he made last year. But try and let anyone else make that kind of dough, it’s a WHOLE different matter. The Hypocrite-in-Chief made it easy for me today. Apparently all that stuff from Reverend Wright didn’t rub off on the Thief-in-Chief after all because he failed to tithe:

What is surprising, given the recent controversy over Obama’s membership in the Trinity United Church of Christ, is how little the Obamas apparently gave to charity — well short of the biblical 10% tithe for all seven years. In two of the years, the Obamas gave far less than 1% of their income to charity; in three of the years, they gave around 1% of their income to charity. Only in the last two years have they given substantially more as their income skyrocketed — 4.7% in 2005 and 6.1% in 2006. (Of course, it is possible that the Obamas may have made gifts to other worthy causes that were not deductible for federal income tax purposes.)

And Peter Orszag, after Monday’s first meeting of the President’s Fiscal Commission admits the “current policy is unsustainable.” Hey, I didn’t take ECON 101 or POLY Sci but I already knew this.

Unsustainable spending

And the pain continues under Obamacare. One third of employers may be penalized for health coverage deemed ‘unaffordable.’

Many will probably consider paying the penalty, which is considerably cheaper, than choosing to enroll employees in Obamacare.

Budgets currently in the Administration will:

  • create long term deficits
  • reduce availability of dollars for investment
  • increase needed borrowing from abroad
  • elevate interest rates

I don’t need TOTUS or crib notes to remember the above. Has been burned in my brain.

Crossposted

Sebelius Under the Gun: Clueless about New Healthcare Law

Normally I like to end my articles with a video, but today I’ve decided to start with one. Here is HHS Secretary Sebelius clueless about how much new H/C high risk pools will cost:

I guess Pelosi was wrong. Even after the bill was passed, they still don’t know what’s in it.

The Republican Ways and Means Committee put out a report today regarding yesterday’s CMS analysis of the Democrats’ health care bill. Check out a few of the ways in which the health care bill will increase costs. Here is the full report by CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). The full report is 38 pages long, if you want to read the whole thing, knock yourself out. If not, below are a few key points:

  • Health Care Costs Increase: “national health expenditures under the health reform act would increase by a total of $311 billion (0.9 percent) during calendar years 2010-2019.” [Page 4] The actuaries found the law bends the cost curve up by a greater degree than either the House or Senate-passed legislation, despite the Administration’s claim that slowing national health spending was the “single most important” reason to overhaul the health system.
  • Over One-Half Trillion in Medicare Cuts: The Medicare actuaries found that the new health law cuts “$575 billion” [Page 4] from Medicare.
  • Seniors’ Access to Care Jeopardized: As a result of the cuts to Medicare, the actuaries found, “absent legislative intervention, [providers] might end their participation in the program (possibly jeopardizing access to care for beneficiaries).” [Page 10]
  • Workers & Seniors Can’t Keep the Health Plan They Have and Like: “We estimate that such actions would collectively reduce the number of people with employer-sponsored health coverage by about 14 million.” [Page 7] Furthermore, 2 million Americans who currently have employer-provided health coverage will be dumped into Medicaid. [Page 3] Additionally, the actuaries predict millions of seniors will lose their Medicare plan because massive cuts to the program will result in, “about 50 percent” of seniors no longer being in a plan. [Page 11].

From Rep. Mike Pence (R-IN) here are more negative effects:

  • National health care expenditures will increase by $311 billion.
  • Health care increases to 21% of GDP by 2019.
  • ObamaCare spends more than $828 billion for health care coverage. (CMS didn’t analyze all the tax increases, such as HSAs, FSAs, increasing the AGI threshold, etc.)
  • The government will spend $410 billion to expand Medicaid.
  • Medicaid enrollment increases by 20 million new beneficiaries.
  • 18 million people will be uninsured (excluding 5 million illegal immigrants).
  • Uninsured and those employers who don’t offer coverage will pay $120 billion in taxes.
  • 50% of seniors will lose their Medicare Advantage plans.
  • Some of the Medicare cost-control mechanisms may not be sustainable.
  • Community Living Assistance Services and Supports (CLASS) will run a deficit in 15 years.
  • The $5 billion for High Risk Pools is not enough.
  • Doctors may drop out of Medicare because of the changes in Medicare reimbursement rates.
  • Medicare “savings” may be difficult to achieve.

From Beltway Confidential, via the New York Times, we are told what we already knew: this law was about income redistribution. From the Times:

The bill that President Obama signed on Tuesday is the federal government’s biggest attack on economic inequality since inequality began rising more than three decades ago. [sic] In effect, healthy families will be picking up most of the bill — and their insurance will be somewhat more expensive than it otherwise would have been.

Here is a video of House Minority Whip Eric Cantor discusses the CMS report:

We need to repeal Obamacare in a hurry and start from scratch.

Crossposted

Congress Docs form Caucus, Rip Dems “Law” to shreds

The Republican docs in Congress did a terrific job during the Health Care debate and have now formed their own website with pertinent information for all of us.

Headed by Rep. Phil Gingrey (GA), M.D.

Rep. Phil Gingrey (R-GA) M.D.

Rep. Phil Gingrey (R-GA) M.D.

and Rep. Tim Murphy (PA), Ph.D;

Rep. Tim Murray (R-PA) Ph.D

Rep. Tim Murray (R-PA) Ph.D

they have launched a group named GOP Doctors Caucus.

On the site they discuss:

  • Creation of High Risk Pools
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Health IT
  • Medical Liability Reform
  • Medicare and Medicaid Reform
  • Purchasing Health Insurance Across State Lines
  • Quality Transparency
  • SGR/Medicare Physician Payment Fix

as well as other issues.

Here is a video of the docs at a bicameral presser:

The docs in the presser are Rep. Parker Griffith, Rep. John Boozman, Rep. Phil Gingrey, and Rep. Paul Broun. I especially love Rep. Broun calling Madame Pelosi “ignorant, incompetent and arrogant.” My kind of guy.

GOP.gov discusses the issue How Does ObamaCare Answer the Problem of Preexisting Conditions? Of course we know, it ain’t what Obama told us. Increased costs for all health insurance buyers and not good value for the money. Even ultraliberal Ezra Klein says this:

“The theory behind the [individual] mandate is simple: It’s there to protect against an insurance death spiral. Now that insurers can’t discriminate based on preexisting conditions, it would be entirely possible for people to forgo insurance until, well, they develop a medical condition. In that world, the bulk of the people buying insurance on the exchanges are sick, and that makes the average premiums terrifically expensive.”

Obamacare provides $5 billion for high-risk pools for pre-existing conditions before the individual mandate begins in 2014. However, Rick Foster, CMS’s chief actuary, believes $5 billion isn’t enough:

“We estimate that the creation of a national high-risk insurance pool would result in roughly 375,000 people gaining coverage in 2010, increasing national health spending by $4 billion. By 2011 and 2012 the initial $5 billion in Federal funding for this program would be exhausted, resulting in substantial premium increases to sustain the program; we anticipate that such increases would limit further participation.”

Yep. We already knew that. And that isn’t all. IRS tax chief Doug Shulman announces “Buy Health Insurance or Lose your Tax Refund.” Nice. According to Business Week:

Beginning in 2015, Americans who don’t purchase insurance will be subject to a fine of $325, increasing to $695 in 2016.

In closing, I’ll leave you with another video in which Rep. Gingrey says he believes this bill law is unconstitutional:

But we already knew that too. Repeal it.